November 24, 2009 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
I've noticed some of the trolling assholes here and on the forums making the outrageous claim that we "cannot put ads in our profile" as we did on the old Slexchange.com, then Xstreet and then later XStreetsl.com
But in fact, it's absolutely allowed and perfectly fine to put a tagline on your forums signature that indicates your business and your inworld SLURL and some kind of statement.
Here's the relevant part from the guidelines, quoted *in full* -- it's often quoted only partially:
Exceptions for Profiles and Signatures: The purpose of the Second Life web profile and signature text is to tell others something about you and your posts that they will find interesting, pleasant, funny, thoughtful, or helpful. The profile and signature are not for advertising or commercial promotion. However, you may include in your profile photo your company logo or the name of your business. You may also associate tags with your profile, and your tag may be the name of your business inworld or on Xstreet SL. In your signature text, you may include your business name, SLurl links to your inworld stores, links to your Xstreet SL marketplace listings, as well as links to your personal website, so long as the website does not include any offers to trade, sell, or purchase outside a Linden Lab property as described above.
So repeat, In your signature text, you may include your business name, SLurl links to your inworld stores, links to your Xstreet SL marketplace listings, as well as links to your personal website.
That's why this signature of mine, like many others of the same type, is perfectly legal:
*Ravenglass Rentals* ~ Low-Cost Refundable Beautiful Mainland~ +Set Home to Here!+ http://bit.ly/6twVeI
Like many others on the commerce forums.
No Linden has ever told me to take it down, and indeed, they couldn't as you can include your business name and your SLURL in your signature.
That is indeed permissible advertising.
November 24, 2009 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
The Lindens are announcing their annual prize again.
It's a good thing for a company whose mission is "to connect us all to a virtual world for the bettering of humankind" to have an annual prize -- I'm all for it.
This particular Linden prize effort is fair -- it does not have fake crowdsourcing as its sole imperative and it has clear criteria in advance and Linden judges.
The critera is very strict and it's a steep climb to comply with them, but that's acceptable for a price that will provide US $10,000, not a trivial amount of money.
* Work in Second Life that also achieves tangible, compelling results outside of Second Life.
* Distinctive, original work using Second Life that clearly demonstrates high quality, execution, function, aesthetics and technical sophistication.
* Work that has the capacity for inspiring and influencing future development, knowledge, creativity, and collaboration both inside and outside of Second Life.
Lots of us do any one of these three things -- doing all three is special and hard. But that's what prizes are about.
In one larger sense, you could say all of Second Life brings compelling results outside of Second Life because even if someone as a "casual consumer" uses SL only to find a date, it's still something that feeds their heart and soul in real life.
If they use Second Life to achieve more meaningful results, like rehabilitation after stroke, or loss of a loved one, or trauma from serving in the armed forces overseas and being injured in combat, so much the more so.
I'd like to see the better worlding be less politically-correct than it has in past years, but I realize this is the *Linden* prize, not the Prokofy Prize which would avoid political correctness.
Some people think the bars are set too high. But I can think right off the top of my head a perfectly well-qualifying group: Beta Technologies. Gwyn has forsaken her "socialism-on-one-sim" experiment in Neualtenberg and now frankly gone into business. That's what you need to do to get paid, and then, having become paid, you are free to pursue your socialist utopias as you wish.
This year, Beta Technologies is making a gateway sim for people to join the "work in SL" thing that Amanda Linden is pumping. I have a story to tell about that concept in another post, but, let's just say it is a tangible good to help people don their work avatars and get busy being business bodies in virtual worlds without having to pay the $55,000 fee for the SL Enterprise.
But what Beta Technologies is doing that is more relevant to this prize is creating a way to become involved in the Copenhagen talks on climate change. HOPENHAGEN are the signs they've put up around the UN. This seems like it fits then all three of this criteria for the prize, so Beta could be applying easily.
Should you have to be a non-profit to win a Better World prize? It doesn't seem to say so. And I don't think you should. Companies should be encourged to make a profit and better the world, too.
But...read the fine print on the FAQs:
"Individuals or Groups that have an employment history or contractual relationship with Linden Lab will be ineligible."
At long last, an anti-FIC, anti-favouritism clause in a Linden Prize! I almost fell out of my chair. As a Gold Service Provider that signed an NDA with the lab and paid them a fee to participate in this program to be listed, they'd be considered to be in a contractual relationship...right?
This is a good thing, if the Lindens keep out of this prize their already-feted GSPs and other "specials". They may not think of signing an NDA as "signing a contract". They may also not think of paying a fee to be listed as "signing a contract" -- and I suppose then, that Beta could enter.
In one sense, we all understand the Lindens are going to pick the FIC. I've always said that if they are going to do that, just pick *good* FIC that has demonstrable merit.
BTW, Gwyn's operation even has a New York office now! complete with a guy's picture of how he looked like a hippie in 1972. This site does not disappoint.
Thinking of my own projects to better SL and even RL in the long run, I realize they just aren't ready yet to apply for this prize. They don't reach the mark yet. That's ok, I can be inspired for another year.
Thinking of other projects that could apply that you'd not necessarily think of, I'd think of Peter Strinberg who runs the translation agency. Probably no one else has facilitated language capacity in SL as much as he has, and this has tangible results in SL and RL. It's a big sprawling a concept to think of as "a project" as it has no "build" -- but I'd encourage the Lindens not to have "a build" for everything that they'll be willing to look at as bettering the world. Some of the best world-betterers may not have land or builds, but just have a good networking idea for a function to fulfill, or have a group, or meet in a sandbox or infohub.
I could ask the people in the Resident Infohubs to apply -- but not enough valid "RL benefit" to make the cut.
I know some small projects among my tenants that are SL presences with a RL application - I won't mention them so as not to overwhelm them and because they haven't asked to be publicized. Any one of these little projects helping just some segment of a RL community to gain help on line and create social networks and get educated in fact could be eligible for this prize -- and they'd get a lot more use out of the $10,000 than a company would.
I'm not thinking now of any nonprofits in SL with a presence on Non-Profit Island that impress. Mainly they do NOT impress me.
For example, let's take Kiva.org which is now being heavily flogged by Pink Linden in her bid to try to manage her reputation damage and the damage to her program resulting from the outrageous assault on the merchant class.
I'm all for Kiva.org. It's a great concept. And maybe that's just the ticket for them to apply to the Linden prize -- their being flogged on the splash screen now in the Winterfest thing isn't going to disqualify them as they didn't "sign a contract".
I do wonder, however, about the obvious: I can't pay Linden dollars to them to have them fund a project in another country that needs help. As far as I know. They are not using that route because there are too many complexities, I guess (although I don't see that there are, really). I can put a tip in their tipjar that goes to...their operating costs, I guess. Their tip jar had about $21,000 when I visited -- that's...US $78. See, that gets lost quickly on a U.S. operating cost. But small amounts that funded those third-world projects if they were visible and you could fund them directly with the SL interface would be amazing.
I also don't see that their presence contains mirror builds or connected real-time manifestations of the things they fund --and that's what I was hoping it would do.
Kiva.org then merely becomes another web page in SL -- a kiosk, a stand. It's just a small build with a few signs and traffic of 33 as a result. And I think it has to do more than that especially to get this prize.
November 24, 2009 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
We've all been forced to think about newbie-helping and freebies these days a lot because of the corporativist merchanteering going on with the overhaul of Xstreet policies.
It's really awful to watch, and fills me with dismay -- it's the ugliest face I've ever seen the Lab show to us all these years. If I thought copyleftist goofy tekkie-wiki social engineers and their extropian wacko brethren were a problem on the left we had to tackle with all available means, whoops, like Titoism, after the Balkan wars set in, you will be yearning for that leftist corrective when you see what the creator-fascist right has in store for you: draconian controls over the economy and a horrendous privileging of certified merchants that will squeeze everybody out of commerce except the Lindens and their friends. Why Godwinism so soon in the post? Because it really is the worst kind of controls I've seen in a long time -- suggestions that only people with payment on file can hold virtual currency or virtual inventory or create; suggestions that only merchants with a certain degree of quality or quantity should be allowed to sell on the web shop; bad idea after bad idea invoked by these strange touts and alts and seeming Linden plants.
But before I think too much more about this awful stuff, I have to circle around and look at the root of the problem, so to speak, or rather, the symptom of other problems that could enable the creator-fascists in the first place to declare everybody's content but their own "crap" and "clutter" and demand that freebies be removed from Xstreet -- or pay a whopping taxation to keep them there. (Ordinal Malaprop's description of this system and what's wrong with it here is likely to be easier to read and more agreeable for most people to read).
I'd like to tackle the problem of the sickness of newbie-helping and the sickness of freebies today, however.
These *are* sicknesses -- dysfunctions -- unlike real life in many ways, and are an outgrowth of the artifices of our world, the strangeness of life online, the outcome of various bad California ideologies, etc. And as such, they need resolute tackling. And pondering.
Right now we're seeing literally hundreds -- thousands -- of people be rudely disabused of this ardent fantasy that they have -- that they "help the community" and that Linden Lab and that community (defining what community is, is of course another matter) want nothing more but for them to post their freebies forever.
In fact, as this thing heats up, we even have a posse of very irate divas demanding that "community tools", i.e. "socially useful" freebies be privileged and now be exempt from the fees.
Sigh.
Then we get an idea of how everybody's "community tools" differ. For one guy, his spank-me animation, some romance bling thing, some other ridiculous titler or something -- these are "community tools". That's ridiculous. They're just gimmicks. If he values them and likes sharing them with his particular social niche of tackiness, let him, but don't inflict that on the entire community as a "utility".
I think of utilities in SL as being things like the door scripts, and scripts for notecard giver, and even more important, notecard-taker; and all the functional simple scripts that make the basics like kill particle, talk, teleport, hover text, etc.
Somebody else might think the x-flight or feather flight devices or the pose stands are essential.
So, let communities distribute them without all the fuss. Let somebody put them up on XStreet in aggregate to save on fees. Or pay the fees -- they aren't that much in RL terms if you give up one latte or two a month.
But...let's look closer at what it is that makes people want to give freebies all the time and "help newbies".
There are seven reasons people do this, from my experience:
1. They are genuinely altruistic and really want to give back because they themselves were once helped and they think it's a good thing.
2. They need to be needed, they are lonely, and the vulnerability and dependence on them that newbies develop because they help feeds their sagging self-esteem.
3. They like controlling people and being know-it-alls and the newbie helpie business provides ample scope for heavily shaping people's experience, impression, knowledge.
4.They wish to enhance their reputation and be seen as being generous and Lady Bountiful because they can then parlay that social capital into privileges with Lindens, or even sales in their business.
5. They have a crass notion of exploiting vulnerable newbies by making them slide into their commerce circles by helping them and staging them into stores or clubs to buy things (SL Mentors were particularly notorious for this, and misused their roles constantly to sell their own stuff or their friends' stuff and to lord it over people -- good riddance to them, I say).
6. They are empire builders -- the thought of legions of people who "knew them when" and got helped and are grateful makes them feel big and powerful and they love the ego infusion.
7. They need loss-leaders to get people to their stores, and need free advertising which comes from posting freebies on XStreet, because they are in a world with severe competition and poor media capacity.
Most of the time, people are helping newbies not for reason no. 1, but for reasons number 2-7. It's a nasty business, because if you call them on this, they become defensive and invoke reason number 1, as if that gives them a cover endlessly.
It doesn't.
Continue reading "The Sickness of Helping Newbies, the Sickness of Freebies" »
November 24, 2009 | Permalink | Comments (27) | TrackBack (0)
November 22, 2009 | Permalink | Comments (3) | TrackBack (0)
November 21, 2009 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Recent Comments