Links

  • Links
Photobucket
My Photo

Tip Jar

Support Blog

Tip Jar

Official Second Life Blog

EngageDigital

Readings

Creative Commons

  • Poll

« Russian Hangout | Main | Buyer's Remorse? »

October 14, 2009

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451cfe069e20120a63cdc8a970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Emerald Floggers:

Comments

Sarah Sheldon

(In case you don't remember my SL name is Untameable Wildcat)

It is fine to be as critical as you like of any viewer you dislike on your own blog. That's called free speech.

There is protocol to follow, nettiquette, when you use any kind of forum or group IM system. That protocol says you don't flood casual chat with your own grievances about others or about other viewers. If you don't like a viewer, fine, say "I personally wouldn't advise using this viewer because " and move on.

If people want to hear your point of view, they'll google you and find your blog, as I did. That then becomes their choice. It's wrong to impose that against their will by lecturing on an open channel.

Prokofy

"Sarah", you're full of shit, and just listen to yourself, you sound like a goddamn school marm. Good God, the sheerm smarmy conformism of young people today, it's disgusting.

If those freaks can get on Concierge and flog Emerald mindlessly, heedless of the implication, then I sure as hell can get on and criticize it.

There isn't any "protocol" that we have to follow on the Concierge list about "how we talk," that's ridiculous. What happens is that the little fucktards on there bang on the Lindens, and the Lindens feel like they "must" respond when they have a dozen fanboyz banging on them at once, it never fails. They have no spine. They should work on principle, and not on whether on not little flashmobs of cretins bang on them.

They flood chat with mindless fanning of Emerald, I'm right back at them with legitimate, documented criticism.

Good God on a crutch, look at the goddamn officers of Emerald Point Management and how they have tolerated the Woodbury griefers to rent land and join their management group. That tells you all you need to know right there.

I love how you "grant me free speech" on my blog. Thanks a lot! But REAL free speech of the kind we still do have in America unlike whatever rock you're growing under does not require you to be positive, to follow protocol, to refrain from criticism -- and doesn't even require that you "not engage in personal attacks". In fact, neither this speech today, or the speech I posted from Concierge yesterday that some vicious little furry abuse-reported me for were actual personal attacks. It's not a personal attack to point out that these accounts on the Emerald dev group and management group are very young, they are obvious alts, and those two that were very copiously documented as griefing me and my tenants are now missing from the people list. So go know. These are facts that have to be brought to the public eye.

P.S. Untameable Wildcat is a frequent flyer harasser of me on the JIRA, a prissy little oppressive non-entity.

Sarah Sheldon

Ah, so I'm now part of your conspiracy because I've been critical of you on the JIRA?

Well, you know who you sound like?

Orly Taitz.

You are so full of conspiracy theories based on nothing more than your own fanciful imagination, so ready to release a tirade of semi-linked, unproven conspiracy theories at the least opportunity.

You love to group people together into these strangely and quaintly named groups that all have this agenda to put you down, grief you, silence you, whatever it is this week - when in fact all you have is an overinflated view of your own importance.

I'm not oppressive. I have no rank to BE oppressive. I'm a resident in Second Life, nothing more than that. Yet somehow according to you I'm a "frequent flier" (last time I visited the JIRA was so long ago it's no longer in the 60-day history of visited URLs) harasser of you? I criticize where I think criticism is due, and I praise where praise is due. What's the difference between my criticism of you and your criticism of any of the people you were talking to in this group? What makes you the supposed hero of the people and me a "prissy little oppressive non-entity"?

Your "facts that have to be brought into the public eye" seem to be as stable as Orly Taitz' Kenyan Obama Birth Certificate. To you they are hard facts that everyone should be investigating, when in fact they are just a bunch of semi-linked entities or happenings that are being turned into this massive conspiracy idea by you, so that you can draw attention to yourself for being "the persecuted one" when you're nothing but a prissy little oppressive non-entity with delusions of usefulness yourself.

Prokofy Neva

A good one to repost...

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Search

  • Search
    Custom Search

Ads

  • Google AdSense

Ads

  • Google AdSense
Blog powered by TypePad

Google Analytics

Networked Blogs

  • Networked Blogs