Typepad Pulls My Blog Post on Justice League after Frivolous JLU Copyright Complaint

Readers may have noticed that an entry on my blog has been scrubbed that was on the Justice League United's abusive planned Phantom Zone ban-link system attached to a secretive and privacy-violating wiki containing SL as well as RL information. The entry contained plans for a scripted system to share ban information and add profile information of residents, and a long list of names of people already in the Brainiac wiki.

I didn't hear anything at first, despite days of JLU regulars threatening and bullying me in world. I didn't get any notice from Typepad. Then suddenly last night, I got a letter from the customer service saying they had removed content at the request of a "copyright holder" because I myself had not removed it upon their initial request January 13.

I never got any request in fact January 13, and even checked through the spam folders -- I had nothing. So after 6 days, Typepad removed it, without really examining the material or making a determination -- that's not how it works. When companies get a claim about copyright, their default is to remove it first, and ask questions later. I appealed the move and explained that basically, these jerkimers were QQing about their leaked game strategy in their men-in-tights superhero RP, but I have no idea if this will get anything like a sophisticated reading. Perhaps in due course I'll pursue this more vigorously, as others might do.

Curiously, when I tried to file an abuse report on Kalel Vankman for disclosure, stalking and threats, I got a "mailer daemon" failed delivery notice inside my email tied to my IMs in SL -- VERY WEIRD. In other words, my *inworld* abuse report *bounced* outworld as if returned mail. Is that how the Lindens prevent their beloved Kalel from ever suffering an abuse report?! I filed it again and will follow up. I want answers from the Lindens on this, because they should not be presiding over a system that hooks up from inworld to people's real-life information. These self-appointed vigilantes should not be the ones contacting the FBI, either. That should be done exclusively by the Lindens *and those parties directly harmed by griefers*. The JLU are unwanted and abusive intermediaries.

Meanwhile, with the Herald continuing to post stories on this subject daily with a three-card monte of torrent sites willing to defy the takedown notices, especially one in Canada, the boys in spandex are in for a lot more "damage" than in fact anything in my blog could have ever been construed to cause them. 

Correspondence below.

Jen Beeghly-Hills, Jan 19 11:25 am (PST):

Dear Sir or Ma'am-

This email is to let you know that we've recently been forced to delete content from your TypePad blog, specifically the post here:
http://secondthoughts.typepad.com/second_thoughts/2010/01/woodbury-and-justice-league-goon s-develop-new-larp-ar-vw-rp.html

The content was deleted due to violations relating to sections 7(f) of the Terms of Service. If you need to, you can re-read TypePad's Terms of Service at:
http://www.typepad.com/legal/terms-of-service.html

Thanks,
Jen
TypePad One
Six Apart Ltd

---

Dyerbrookme, Jan 13 08:57 pm (PST):

Dear Sir or Ma'am-

We apologize for the need to contact you, but it has been brought to our attention that content attached to your blog at http://secondthoughts.typepad.com/second_thoughts/ is currently in violation of TypePad's Terms of Service. You can view TypePad's Terms of Service at: http://www.typepad.com/legal/terms-of-service.html The relevant section of the Terms of Service is sections 7(f).

Specifically, the content included in the post here:

http://secondthoughts.typepad.com/second_thoughts/2010/01/woodbury-and-justice-league-goon s-develop-new-larp-ar-vw-rp.html

has be reproduced without permission of the copyright holder. Because of this, we must ask that you remove the following content as soon as possible and that you not repost this material, even partially.

Please remove this material as soon as possible and contact us to let us know of your compliance. If we have not heard back from you within two business days, specifically by 18 January 2010, we will remove the disputed content.

Please let us know if you have any other questions.

Thanks,
Jen
TypePad One
Six Apart Ltd

Dear Jen,

You have improperly deleted this content merely with the usual response from service 
providers because you have not read the content.

Please note the following:

1. The person filing the complaint is an avatar in a virtual world, he has not provided a 
real name.
2. He has no business or company that is registered, he is merely a game player in a 
roleplay.
3. His "business document" that he claims "copyright" in is merely a 
game strategy.
4. The incident covered in my blog has to do with whistle-blowing on an aggressive and 
abusive group known as the "Justice League United" which collects information 
on people accessing Second Life without their knowledge or consent, and aggregates it in 
order to access it to expose their privacy and cause harm to them.
5. Therefore, the notion that a scripted system that is aggregating people's personal 
information and exposing it, in violation of the type of terms of service you or any 
other ISP has, can then claim "copyright" protection such as to continue their 
abusive practices, is offensive.

I think if you simply read this blog entry and the avatar's document, which is merely 
abusive leaked game strategy in a virtual world designed to harm other people, you'll 
restore the content.

Comments

[Brinda Allen]

Oh hell Prok...You rang the bell :-))

And, as one that spent a lot of time in court in my younger years, I understand that...............
Once the bell rings, it can't be unrung.

All that JLU *copywrong* materials crap is out in the light of day where it belongs.

As a nod of the head to our Southern friends...You done good!

[cube inada]

hmm.
why i keep my own websites and use direct isps.

why not set up a small websote and publish the whole doo dang, wordpress response as well...

but to them youre only a noise maker for google ad words...

or why not just let the "fanboys" work for ya... spread the word on the whole shibang to the comic book websites.... they would love to hear about Superman and his latest exploits.:)

[Paddy Wright]

Prok,

I read your blog often. I mostly despair at the way you treat people who post here. But that's what makes you so readable. But on this occasion you are spot on. I took the time to download the full .rar files from the JLU and trawled through some of it. Frankly the files disgust me. Silly children sharing gossip and innuendo on SL users. They need exposing and shaming. So for once, thanks for your work. I hope this exposure will lead to LL expelling this group and any associated groups from SL. There is no place for them in the liberal and inclusive society I hoped SL was.

[cube inada]

who is plexus linden?
if the post at the herald has any truth, he may just have become the smokong gun for any and all IP infrigment cases against LL. Prior knowledge and actaully encoraging IP infrigment isn order to ENTICE ?WTF Time Warner?

whats also sad is that employees hide behind an avatar name in the little world of LL.. and will most likely end up working for another media company soon...

it seems you ahve to be s special kind --to work at LL.

anonymous avatars- secret lists- real money----real peoples lives...gamed again.. so little around this LL virtuality is redeemable.. so little

[Prokofy Neva]

Cube, the Herald does what you wish -- BTW, they are on typepad too, and I wonder if they will be forced to take anything down. I think probably coyly dodged this by providing links to other sites that publish everything in full, and thereby giving themselves a pass.

People have focused on the list of names and the content of the wiki profiles. That is not copyrightable material, it's intelligence, and even the JLU isn't apparently trying to declare this is copyrighted material per se, they are being cunning and issuing these takeown notices based on what they say are their "invention design documents" from their "business".

I think it's important to publish the notes on the invention, because it explains things about how LSL work, and the Lindens servers, and how they expect to interact with LL's software to scrape and preserve data on third-party sites and then regurgitate data inworld. But I don't have the resources to start my own website on my own server, hunt around for sites that aren't so allergic and automatic to takedown notices, etc. etc. There are enough people out there now with this material that it is getting a hearing and a circulation so I don't really need to be involved.

The Herald has published more articles with transcripts purporting to be from Plexus Linden that are highly disturbing, but they are from 2007 and the Lindens abruptly ended the special relationship with the JLU it appears.

[Joanna]

Republished: http://joanna-falmer.blogspot.com/2010/01/prokofys-blog-post-on-jlu-vigilante.html

[AnnOtooleInSL]

So file a counter DMCA and if they don't restore it sue for damages and also file perjury charges against whoever sent a letter to typepad. Hopefully the letter to typepad wasn't filed by a false identity like an SL account. That would make typepad in an even worse way if they are taking legal actions on behalf of fictitious identities. And when the counter is filed then Typepad has to provide you with the rl identity and address of whoever filed the DMCA. Then you can post the information on the internet for all to see who is committing perjury and proceed from there. When the person goes to jail for perjury then hopefully someone will film the frog march to justice.

[Ener Hax]

Prok always speaks from the heart tempered by research and intelligence. i don't always agree, but i will always defend Prok's right to express thoughts and passions

funny how in this land that claims freedom of speech we suddenly try to shut off the voices of those we don't agree with

i have a deep respect for Prok and despise those trying to ridicule or belittle as a means of debate

*goes off to make a cafepress shirt saying Prok Rocks* =)

btw, since words are cheap, if you ever want to be hosted for free and don't mind a wordpress.org self-hosted blog (this should have an export feature), i have plenty of space on my reseller account with media temple

[Melissa Yeuxdoux]

"i have a deep respect for Prok and despise those trying to ridicule or belittle as a means of debate"

Talk about doublethink...

[generic viagra]

Being bound to work restricts freedom. Don’t you sometimes feel like running away from the hassles of work? Does marriage also restrict freedom? I think many married people feel that their freedom has been restricted.
Is it not possible to not to be bound to anyone or anything and live life on day to day basis and do whatever, whenever and wherever you feel like doing (here I am not talking about insane things). Do you feel sometimes trapped by modern forms of slavery like mortgage etc?

[dental health center]

I'm looking for a non-obvious list of 30 companies (with various
different types of business models) that "fit the bill."

[Archie Chelmsford]

I am amazed.

It is totally amazing that someone you described as an anonymous avatar, a dick-wad, fucktard and someone you totally dismissed his statement he was barrister, and stated you were in breach of Terms of Service, specifically section 7(f).

If he was correct about this could he have also been correct about the other things is said and you scathingly disregarded.

[Prokofy Neva]

Um, and you are...?

I have no idea what you're talking about here. Are you another alt of Rory Serpentine and are you talking about that psycho? He claims to be some kind of legal professional.

Or are you talking about this case of the JLU guy? He's no lawyer, doesn't claim to be one, and I didn't call him a fucktard to my recollection, but I might just as well have, and can call him -- and you -- one, if that makes you happier.

What I write on my blog is outside the jurisdiction of any SL terms of service, and I hardly think any Typepad terms of service will apply on speech grounds. Typepad is not Linden Lab. They hew more to real cases of serious incitement rather than to police robust speech on blogs. They're in the blog business, not the social-engineering business, like the Lindens, and they understand what their customer base requires.

The JLU's claim that my publication of their "brainstorming" about how they were conspiring to violate the TOS and privacy guarantees for other residents then constitutes "copyright violation" is silly and just a gambit. The Herald fought this with Typepad and won. Then they stuck a finger in their eye and left Typepad. I have no doubt if I raised it they'd also see reason and put back the content, but I have no time for this, and I'm otherwise happy with Typepad.

[Archie Chelmsford]

Who am I? What a very short memory you have Prokofy.

I am a reader of your blog. I went back, back, back and started reading and making notes on the inconsistencies, errors, personal attacks etc you have made.

I am the person you referred to on this your own blog as "Some other guy named Archie something from the Desmond sort of sims came..."

For the record I NEVER complained about anyone being banned, you banned me because I said the truth which was, as reported in your blog -

[18:55] Prokofy Neva: and you seem to be playing a faux polite game with this
[18:55] Archie Chelmsford: I am not faux polite
[18:56] Archie Chelmsford: not everyone feels the need you do Mr Neva to use obscenities
[18:56] Prokofy Neva: Hey I'm done

That Prokofy is who I am.

I expect you will now as seems to be your habit label me a griefer, or say I am harassing you, sec and ban me from your blog.

See you at the next Dam Meeting.

[Prokofy Neva]

Oh! Now I remember you. Oh, you're just the usual annoying asshole. You kept interrupting the meeting to complain that other people who were obviously Woodbury griefers on new alts were being banned, and sorry, but when I have inworld meetings, I ban griefers. I also ban people who are disruptive and keep going off-topic to bang on their chests with self-righteousness about who else is being banned.

I'm not required to have you on my land. I'm interesting in having discussions, not playing faux liberal with you. Also your faux polite bullshit is in the transcript with the usual Victorian RP. Not interested.

I don't ban people from my blog unless the violate one of my two rules. Look them up. As for the dam meeting, I'm not required to have disruptive assholes trying to prove a point in these meetings, so no, I won't see you because you'll be banned. Have your own event and ban people who use obscenities so you can feel superior. You seem to need that sort of injection of rectitude that only the online persona can give you in your under-exciting real life.

[Prokofy Neva]

Oh! and you also have a hugely selective memory -- actually, you're a lying piece of shit. Because you tried to force Toxic there even though she was banned for cause and knows it -- and then you did indeed bitch about her being banned and went on and on in feigned shock about her being a griefer blah blah blah. The record shows it:

18:52] Archie Chelmsford: May I invite a friend/
[18:52] Prokofy Neva: You know recently I was discussing search ranking at work about various sites, and I was so surprised to find that Second Thoughts does better on Alexa than many sites -- and it's for one simple reason. It's a tech site linked to other tech sites, and they rule the roost. The top sites in Google are Google's cohorts, friends, peers, buddies. And everyone else has to fit in under that
[18:52] Prokofy Neva: yes
[18:52] Archie Chelmsford: thank you
[18:52] Prokofy Neva: it's an open meeting, only those who are griefers who have a history of disrupting are booted
[18:52] Prokofy Neva: by disrupting I mean "crashing the sim or viewers"
[18:53] Archie Chelmsford: She doesn't appear to be able to access - I met her via machinima
[18:53] Archie Chelmsford: A Toxic Menges she has taough me machinima
[18:54] Archie Chelmsford: and I know she was involved with anti content theft and other reatil things
[18:54] Prokofy Neva: No, Toxic Menges iS NOT repeat NOT welcome here
[18:54] Carl Metropolitan: I wonder if there would be money to be made in an independent SL search service.
[18:54] Prokofy Neva: she is on mute, and I don't wish her here
[18:54] Prokofy Neva: she's on mute because she enabled griefers and justified their harassment of me and harassed me on this on Twitter, end of story
[18:54] Prokofy Neva: I'm not required to have people in this discussion who do that
[18:54] Archie Chelmsford: Ok OMG you mean she is a griefer I certainly don't want to get mixed up with people like that
[18:54] Prokofy Neva: she knows EXACTLY what the story is and she's merely agitating
[18:54] Prokofy Neva: she is a griefer enabler and justifer
[18:55] Prokofy Neva: and you seem to be playing a faux polite game with this
[18:55] Kerry Takashi: I don't think they would want a separate search here. They wouldn't allow it.
[18:55] Carl Metropolitan: I thought Electric Sheep tried to build one at one time.
[18:55] Carl Metropolitan: It would have to be web-based
[18:55] Prokofy Neva: they did
[18:55] Prokofy Neva: they were going to try to bypass SL
[18:55] Prokofy Neva: and I still think that would be a great idea, but not on the principles of the Sheep
[18:55] Archie Chelmsford: I am not faxu polite
[18:56] Archie Chelmsford: not everyone feels eth need you do Mr Neva to use obsenities
[18:56] Prokofy Neva: Hey I'm done
[18:56] Carl Metropolitan: The issue would be data collection. To do a good search service for SL, you would have to scrape massive amounts of data without asking, or limit yourself to opt ins only.
[18:56] Prokofy Neva: I want to discuss the topic and not griefers using every trick in the book to get here and harass me

[Prokofy Neva]

People are not banned from the dam for "telling the truth" -- snort.

They're banned for persisting to bitch about other people who are banned and continuing to disrupt the meeting.

Toxic Menges (what a name!) enables griefers, and she knows EXACTLY what she did during SLB6, when I repeatedly asked her to ban griefers from my exhibit who were hanging around and harassing me and she refused. When they all glommed on to my public event, I urged her to grief them to prevent disruption -- she refuses. She even caught Tizzers getting ready to grief, in fact, and then finally dealt with him. But it should have been pre-emptive based on my legitimate request (we couldn't control our ban lists on that exhibit).

Toxic continued to harass and heckle me on Twitter. So for all this, she's on mute. End of story.

[Archie Chelmsford]

So I am able to attend the next meeting at the Dam. Thank you.

I would have no reason to mention Toxic Menges, and yes I agree it is a very unusual name, it sounds like a disease.

[Prokofy Neva]

Er, no. You're not welcome. You're a disruptive pain in the ass and I'm not interested in having you in these discussion. You insisted on bringing in Toxic, when she IM'd you, out of some obnoxious tic.

[Archie Chelmsford]

Prokofy, please read the chat log you posted here.

18:52] Archie Chelmsford: May I invite a friend/
[18:52] Prokofy Neva: yes
[18:52] Archie Chelmsford: thank you
[18:52] Prokofy Neva: it's an open meeting, only those who are griefers who have a history of disrupting are booted
[18:52] Prokofy Neva: by disrupting I mean "crashing the sim or viewers"
[18:53] Archie Chelmsford: She doesn't appear to be able to access - I met her via machinima
[18:53] Archie Chelmsford: A Toxic Menges she has taough me machinima
[18:54] Archie Chelmsford: and I know she was involved with anti content theft and other retail things
[18:54] Prokofy Neva: No, Toxic Menges iS NOT repeat NOT welcome here
[18:54] Prokofy Neva: she is on mute, and I don't wish her here
[18:54] Prokofy Neva: she's on mute because she enabled griefers and justified their harassment of me and harassed me on this on Twitter, end of story
[18:54] Prokofy Neva: I'm not required to have people in this discussion who do that
[18:54] Archie Chelmsford: Ok OMG you mean she is a griefer I certainly don't want to get mixed up with people like that
[18:54] Prokofy Neva: she knows EXACTLY what the story is and she's merely agitating
[18:54] Prokofy Neva: she is a griefer enabler and justifer
[18:55] Prokofy Neva: and you seem to be playing a faux polite game with this
[18:55] Archie Chelmsford: I am not faxu polite
[18:56] Archie Chelmsford: not everyone feels the need you do Mr Neva to use obscenities
[18:56] Prokofy Neva: Hey I'm done

I have simply removed words by others totally unrelated.

You are wrong when you say "You (meaning myself) insisted on bringing in Toxic, when she IM'd you, out of some obnoxious tic. "

Miss Menges only IM'ed me when she could not access the meeting.

I NEVER insisted on bring her, I asked could I invite a friend, to which you said yes.

When you said about Miss Menges [18:54] Prokofy Neva: she's on mute because she enabled griefers and justified their harassment of me and harassed me on this on Twitter, end of story.

My reply was as far from insisting she attend as possible, it was -

[18:54] Archie Chelmsford: Ok OMG you mean she is a griefer I certainly don't want to get mixed up with people like that.

I believe you ejected from teh meeting me for my saying -

[18:55] Archie Chelmsford: I am not faxu polite
[18:56] Archie Chelmsford: not everyone feels the need you do Mr Neva to use obscenities

Now you have said I am banned and unable to attend future meetings.

Prokofy, I have never denied my response to your claim I was being faux-polite.

However I ask that you allow me to attend the next meeting, and make a fair judgment of myself based on that.

I had totally no knowledge of what you told me about Miss Menges. I am totally opposed to griefers and to those who support them.

I believe you have formed an incorrect view of myself.

This is why I ask to attend your next meeting so you can make a fair opinion of myself.

Thank you

[Prokofy Neva]

Um, I don't know where *my* post is where I posted THE EXACT SAME CHAT LOG, duh. Probably got put in the spam bin.

And I reprinted it to show what a fucking LIAR you are that you were not trying to get someone on the parcel. You were. You're contradicting yourself and mixing yourself up in your own lies.

First you say you are not faux polite, then you say you admit you were. Fail!

You are NOT repeat NOT WELCOME at my meetings.

That's because *you are being an asshole* and trying to push your way back in, demand special pleading, get special review of your august self, and you're engaging in the same faux=polite Caledonian bullshit always and everywhere.

I see through these shenanigans. I'm not interested in RPing Victorian gentleman with you. Go away.

It's clear when you say "OMG I don't want to get mixed up people like that" you are putting on a fake polite shtick, in which you really wish to say "Prove she is a griefer, because she doesn't appear to be one, and gosh, I wouldn't want to be mixed up with a griefer, but she doesn't appear to be one, and the real problem is your overreaction and imagining everyone is a griefer."

I get this technique, it's not so clever -- and I'm done. Bye!

[Archie Chelmsford]

No one, least of all an

obese (proof at http://encyclopediadramatica.com/File:Prokofy_Neva_Wired.jpg and http://images.encyclopediadramatica.com/images/e/e8/Prokgroup.jpg Prokofy named as person on the right i.e. wearing spectacles);

paranoid (proof at http://twitter.com/prokofy see Bio quote )

too lazy, or blind with anger at being publicly called out, to read up on their own blog. Quoting Prokofy "Um, I don't know where *my* post is where I posted THE EXACT SAME CHAT LOG, duh. Probably got put in the spam bin." (proof read here - http://secondthoughts.typepad.com/second_thoughts/2010/01/typepad-pulls-my-blog-post-on-justice-league-after-frivolous-jlu-copyright-complaint.html?cid=6a00d83451cfe069e2013485e665bc970c#comment-6a00d83451cfe069e2013485e665bc970cy your own words, EPIC FAIL, calls me a "fucking liar" without proof.

Nor do the incorrectly accuse me of "You're contradicting yourself and mixing yourself up in your own lies." and ".... in which you really wish to say "Prove she is a griefer, because she doesn't appear to be one, and gosh, I wouldn't want to be mixed up with a griefer, but she doesn't appear to be one, and the real problem is your overreaction and imagining everyone is a griefer."think you can get away with it. Again read your own post at your own post you public state you cannot find at http://secondthoughts.typepad.com/second_thoughts/2010/01/typepad-pulls-my-blog-post-on-justice-league-after-frivolous-jlu-copyright-complaint.html?cid=6a00d83451cfe069e2013485e665bc970c#comment-6a00d83451cfe069e2013485e665bc970cy

EPIC FAIL #2.

You cannot and will not.

You have been called out Prokofy. admit you expelled me from that Dam Meeting and have banned me from future meetings because I again called you out in the meeting as follows -

18:55] Prokofy Neva: and you seem to be playing a faux polite game with this
[18:55] Kerry Takashi: I don't think they would want a separate search here. They wouldn't allow it.
[18:55] Carl Metropolitan: I thought Electric Sheep tried to build one at one time.
[18:55] Carl Metropolitan: It would have to be web-based
[18:55] Prokofy Neva: they did
[18:55] Prokofy Neva: they were going to try to bypass SL
[18:55] Prokofy Neva: and I still think that would be a great idea, but not on the principles of the Sheep
[18:55] Archie Chelmsford: I am not faxu polite
[18:56] Archie Chelmsford: not everyone feels eth need you do Mr Neva to use obsenities
[18:56] Prokofy Neva: Hey I'm done

Prokofy you confirm this with your [18:56] Prokofy Neva: Hey I'm done.

So act like an adult and say here "Yes Archie Chelmsford you were ejected and are banned because of that"

Which is effectively you admitting you can dish out obscenities and name calling but I can't take being told I do it.

If that is not the reason then skip all the red herrings and Toxic Menges smoke-screen and say what it really is.

In closing you have placed this blog in the public domain therefore I am keeping a copy of it and should you delete it I shall post elsewhere.

Based on me readings and your past form I expect you will now ban me from your blog. It will be very interesting to see what reason you give. You state you only ban those who break your rules.

Well I am definitely in world, and my avatar links to a legitimate email address,. Drop me an email if you like I will be happy to reply to you.

So all that is left is for you to to claim I have caused you or your family "harm" or "damage".

I have not mentioned your family so it has to be you.

I suspect you will say my factual words about you in the open of this comment have harmed or damaged you.

You will despite my backing my words up with FACTS, a term you appear totally unfamiliar with, and providing the URL of publicly available third-party web-sites who have provided those facts.

I have not harmed or damaged you.

Nor are these comments stalking you.

You know it, I know it, the world, virtual and real knows it.

Time to stop fooling yourself Prokofy and act like a grown-up.

[Prokofy Neva]

Yep, I have a good eye. I knew I was dealing with an arrant asshole the minute you started special-pleading for Toxic not to be banned and got all self-righteous and indignant. And we see the results.

Once again, let me point out for the retarded reading-challenged asshole that you are:

1. You are banned from my land in Second Life. Full stop. End of story. That's all he wrote. Because I can. Because when I run public events, I don't suffer fools lightly. I don't apply my blog rules inworld because I don't have any reason to -- I want a live, real-time discussion with people focusing on a topic, not assholes.

2. On my blog, I have two rules: 1) use of SL or RL or bloggers' names 2) no incitement of damages.

So if your sagging puny little dick-ass life needs an injection of manhood by posting nasty shit on my blog, by all means, post away, referencing my RL pictures, referencing whatever your sorry little fucked up ass needs to post. You'll be allowed to do so as long as rules 1 and 2 aren't violated.

But inworld, in real time, when I'm conducting a public discussion, I don't put up with this sort of crap because I'm not required to. Grow up.

[Archie Chelmsford]

I am so pleased I can continue to post here.

You know Prokofy I have no intention of "taking the bait of your taunts."

However, I shall continue to comment here if I believe you are wrong.

For the record please be aware I have totally no intention of inciting any damages to you.

[viagra online]

Not only is there a cromulent looking bistro with frisee and lardons etc etc, but sushi that looks like it might not kill you.
I recently came across your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I don't know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often.